Recent site activity

ASPECT Blog‎ > ‎

2009-12-16 ASPECT-1 Meeting Minutes

posted Dec 18, 2009 8:37 AM by Lisa Lim

Participants

-Lisa Lim

-Jen Goode

-Marilou Baston

-Craig Bonsignore

-Ahmet Erdemir

-Lindsay Pack

-Tina Morrison

-Brian Berg

-Andy Bicek

-Achim Zipse

-Prasanna Hariharan

-Nandini Duraiswamy

-Vijaya Kolachalama

 

 

Introductory Comments

  • Tina Morrison (FDA) – helping coordinate computational modeling efforts from an FDA perspective
    • Peripheral Vascular Devices Branch, FDA Office of Device Evaluation
    • Fellow:  Reviewer and Research
    • FDA 16 months
    • CV Biomechanics at Stanford

 

Status of R01 Grant

  • AHMET:
    • Helping Vik to write the R01 grant
    • Will use info from web-site to set up a rough draft for grant
    • Then will ask ASPECT for input – what do industry/FDA need?
    • What data and how it is disseminated may change – focus will be to present that they can do this?
  • CCF:  collect, disseminate, do some early modeling (4-5 yr project)
    • While data are being collected, can start on dissemination planning:  e.g., database set-up, etc.
  • VJ:  will fluids be included in grant? Yes/No
  • LISA:  primary goal will be solids
  • AHMET:  no
  • BRIAN: started out as a collaborative project, but CCF is taking over
  • JEN:  fluids – will discuss off-line
  • Sharing data sets early to look at how different groups will do the modeling
  • CRAIG:  get some data now to start figuring out methods for modeling
    • Single example data set – make available
    • Publically?
  • LISA:  those who have chosen to be confidential participants
    • Once we get the legal documents in place (CDAs and MTAs), we can share the data as it is collected
    • Can’t share yet with the public, but can share with the group
    • CRAIG:  can we grab any data – original data set that Paul gave VJ
      • Not sure if this is a full DICOM dataset (bitmap images that were uploaded) – these were IVUS
    • ACTION (Lisa):  ask Paul if there is a working image dataset for each of the imaging types that will be used in the study
    • CRAIG: can set up web-site to differentiate confidential participants vs. non-confidential participants
    • DICOM data sets might be too big to share on Openmedsystems
  • AHMET:  wrote some similar grants; Vik already has some language for clinical write-up, will add some information to the computational section
    • Provide to FDA prior to grant submission – let us know if anything is missing
  • TINA:
    • Gathering data & building models – what images will be used
    • Taking anatomical measurements; with deformations?
    • AHMET:  also Gate analysis on pts – quantify longitudinal deformation in artery
  • TINA:
    • AAA: static CT images
      • Looking at anatomical variations across patients
      • Series of charts:  maximum dimensions – giving range of data
      • Report on 50th percentile, 75th percentile diameters
    • CRAIG:  sounds very complementary – should be able to learn from each other
  • February 5 submission

 

Computational Modeling Protocol

  • Addition of Solid Modeling (T. Morrison edits)
    • Added FDA perspective on solid mechanics modeling
    • Construction of a solid model of a vessel (instead of a rigid cylinder) to be used for bench and simulated testing of an SFA stent design
    • Interaction of stent with vessel/plaque/fluid – many years to address all of this
    • Future:  complex fluid/structure interactions
  • CRAIG:  one key piece is for someone to take ownership and pull it all together  so Tina’s work on this is greatly appreciated
    • Website keeps a history of everything that you do
    • WIKI:  let’s “re-factor” and make a clean version of this (history will be maintained)
    • SOLID MODEL:  tangible translation of anatomic clinical information into engineering terms (like Solidworks) so that it can be used
    • Model:  deformable – may take a long time to do this practically
    • 1st set of examples = v. helpful to show
    • Integrate images so that they are accessible to engineering community (physical tests, boundary conditions for FEM)
  • TINA:  important to think about what data to share with engineers to do future modeling themselves
  • CRAIG:  share data in as raw a form as possible (DICOM dataset); tabular numbers (e.g., bend radii)
    • Often see numbers in tables in publications
    • Hope to also have 3D data available to engineering community
  • BRIAN – two important goals
    • Get and distribute raw data
    • An example of a model built from the data – an interpretation of all the data that was collected – informs what the mechanical environment is that the stents will “see”
  • TINA:  NIH meeting today – high level discussion of model and data repositories
  • AHMET:  heard Tina’s talk – v. good
    • 2 NIH grants
    • Disseminated some data
    • Can send some example pages (including DICOM data sets)
    • CCF:  can collect, can bring it into a usable form to distribute, can develop models and make them available
    • Can make data available through some remote (non-CCF sites), such as Stanford Biomedical Computing Center for NIH [SIMTK]
    • NIH has spent millions on these sites – will help with grant application
    • üACTION (Ahmet):  during the meeting he sent the ASPECT group the web-site they use for their CCF projects (foot/musculoskeletal modeling) -https://simtk.org
    • Can track who downloaded data that was disseminated
    • In R01: 
      • collect data,
      • bring into a usable format (DICOM doesn’t require special software),
      • build models – generate and disseminate geometries, and
      • use for simulation,
      • what will be shared & when
  • CRAIG:  agree that we don’t want to reinvent infrastructure

 

Outstanding ACTION Items

  • Tech Transfer Agreements – FDA is drafting
    • Meeting on Friday – hope to have progress soon, so we can start sharing information
  • ACTION (Paul):  give Achim a wish list for what sizes and how many stents they’d like to have  (Melissa will help)
  • ACTION (Tina):  update the references to include expanded references that she is referring to (on ASPECT site) - done
  • ACTION (Alexander):  Wedge discussion – Alex should FU with Paul to finalize how to fund and design what is needed;  Paul will coordinate a FU discussion with Alexander and other CCF folks who will be appropriate to build
  • ACTION (Paul):  estimation of costs (if dividing by multiple companies)

 

Next Meeting:  1/06/09